The Pittsburgh Tax Review has published Symposium on Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions in its latest issue:
- The Critical Tax Project, Feminist Theory, and Rewriting Judicial Opinions, by Anthony C. Infanti (Pittsburgh) & Bridget J. Crawford (Pace).
- Feminist Statutory Interpretation, by Kim Brooks (Dalhousie).
- United States v. Davis and Prof. Cain’s Rewritten Opinion: An Intersectional Argument for Capping Section 1041, by Diane Klein (La Verne).
- “Rhiannon O’Donnabhain Is a Taxpayer”: Tax and the Social Contract in O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner, by Ann Mumford (King’s College London).
- “Life in All Its Fullness”: Cardozo, Fellows, and the Critical Context of Welch v. Helvering, by Ajay K. Mehrotra (Northwestern).
- Called to Serve: Elevating Human-Performed Caregiver and Volunteer Work in an Era of AI-Robotic Technologies, by Hilary G. Escajeda (Denver).
- Strategies to Materialize Gender Equality in Tax Law and Doctrine: Rewritten Tax Opinions, by Åsa Gunnarsson (Umeå University).
- Tax: Women, Work, and Family, by Ann O’Connell (Melbourne) & Kerrie Sadiq (Queensland).
- Feminist Tax Judgments: Operationalizing Diversity, by Alice G. Abreu (Temple).
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions—The Student Perspective, by Montano Cabezas (McGill) & Brandon King (Indiana).
Recent Comments